Julian Onken vs Tomas Musil Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W L L
Form
W W W W W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Onken 1 - 0 Musil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Onken winning 2 and Musil winning 0. The last match between Onken and Musil was at the Czech Republic F6, 11-07-2016, First, Clay with Julian Onken getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Julian Onken | 1 |
| Tomas Musil | 0 |
Czech Republic F6(11-07-2016)
6
2
6
0
| Onken | Stats | Musil |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 892 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 693 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 36 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (122-90) | Career Total W/L | 53% (37-33) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Julian Onken
Player
Tomas Musil
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:54:0 | Average Match Time | 0:54:0 |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve % | 52% (23/44) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (5/21) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 59% (26/44) | Return Points Win % | 24% (10/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Julian Onken Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Julian Onken
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Herman
Player
Julian Onken
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Musil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-7(1) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Nejedly
Player
Tomas Musil
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (122/90) | Win/Loss | 53% (37/33) |
| 57% (269/205) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (85/77) |
| 54% (2263/1943) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (790/732) |
| 58% (7/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (110/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) |
| 45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 140 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 104 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 349.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 262.86 |
| 64% (3655/5669) | 1st Serve % | 54% (93/171) |
| 61% (2245/3655) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (57/93) |
| 47% (956/2014) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (29/78) |
| 45% (300/663) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (2/12) |
| 44% (2448/5618) | Return Points Win % | 30% (49/162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (3/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (119/87) | Futures W/L | 53% (37/33) |
| 57% (119/207) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (37/70) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (23/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (8/23) |
| 48% (24/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 87% (119/104) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (38/32) |
| 12% (119/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (38/6) |
| 18% (93/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (32/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
